I've not had much time to review all the post Vista launch stories, so thank goodness for those nice people over at ZDNet who have done a good roundup of the reaction and what's been said.One of the more predictable reactions has come from The Green Party, who have criticised the carbon footprint and impact on lower socio-economic groups and businesses of the new OS:
"Vista requires more expensive and energy-hungry hardware, passing the cost on to consumers and the environment. This will also further exclude the poor from the latest technology, and impose burdensome costs on small and medium businesses who will be forced to enter another expensive upgrade cycle."The security industry has started to get stuck into Microsoft over Vista, with Kaspersky being one of the most vocal commentators. They are criticising the warning mechanism of UAC (User Access Control):
Kaspersky says that users will be forced to either blindly ignore the warning and thus allow the action to be performed, or disable the feature to stop themselves going "crazy".Full a
nalysis can be found at Kaspersky's site.Accenture has views very much to the contrary, although the last sentence of the snippet below from the ZDNet article may be quite telling:
"We believe the focus that Microsoft has placed on Vista Security — from core OS changes, such as Windows Service Hardening through features such as BitLocker and the changes to user interface security — will contribute to a more secure product," said Stuart Okin, Accenture's UK head of Infrastructure. Okin previously worked for Microsoft as its chief security officer for the UK.Other interesting piece is that comment is starting to grow about Microsoft's attempts to kill off the JPEG and replace it with a format of its own. If 15% of PCs are to be on Vista by year end, we'll soon know how successful they've been.
Other comment from The Register and The Guardian.








































