Google executive chairman and
former chief executive Eric Schmidt spoke at the Edinburgh Television Festival on Friday, and it's fair to say that the bespectacled executive had plenty to say about the company's products and future plans.
The appearance was much covered ahead of the event with many content providers having previously pilloried Google over issues such as piracy and digital rights, and Schmidt went out of his way to emphasise that Google is behind the TV industry as a whole as well as covering a number of other issues.
Google TV to launch in the UK next yearSchmidt revealed that
they plan to launch their connected TV service in the UK next year, with the service set to compete with players that are already in the market as well as
the upcoming YouView service (also set to launch in 2012).
Google TV uses a special set top box and a consumer's broadband connection to deliver content to the household, and has relatively bombed in the US with users bemoaning a lack of content and user interface problems.
Schmidt said to the conference:
"Google TV is a case in point. When it launched, some in the US feared we aimed to compete with broadcasters or content creators. Actually our intent is the opposite. We seek to support the content industry by providing an open platform for the next generation of TV to evolve, the same way Android is an open platform for the next generation of mobile.
Just as smartphones sparked a whole new era of innovation for the Internet, we hope Google TV can help do the same for Television, creating more value for all. We expect Google TV to launch in Europe early next year, and of course the UK will be among the top priorities."
Schmidt added his belief that YouView have been late to the party and that the UK is lagging behind in such services accordingly.
We'd pay more tax if you let us!Google have
often been criticised for the relatively low amount of corporation tax they pay in the UK, channelling funds through their Irish base - where corporation tax is lower and the country's government have targeted technology firms to have them base their European headquarters there with tax and other incentives.
Earlier in the year The Sunday Times calculated that the search giant has saved as much as £3bn over the last 5 years by using such practices (also passing funds through countries like the Bahamas and Holland), and whilst Google have not (yet) been targeted by groups like
UK Uncut they are clearly wary of the issue and
Schmidt said that they would pay more tax were they permitted to and emphasised their commitment to the UK, where they employ 1,000 staff - largely based in their Victoria offices in London (and of course those staff all pay tax, spend money in the UK economy etc):
"It is true we could pay more tax but we would have to do so voluntarily. It's called paying the legally minimum amount of tax required.
The fact of the matter is there are lots of benefits to [being in Britain]. It's very good for us, but to go back to shareholders and say 'We looked at 200 countries but felt sorry for those British people so we want to [pay them more]' ... there is probably some law against doing that."
The corporate governance point is clearly a key one, but you wonder if
George Osborne is thinking up some schemes to take Schmidt up on his offer on the back of his comments?
The UK needs more tech educationThe lack of education in mathematics and science for UK children and students
was also criticised by Schmidt, who has concerns as to what it might mean for the next round of technology innovation:
"Over the past century the UK has stopped nurturing its polymaths. There's been a drift to the humanities — engineering and science aren't championed.
Even worse, both sides seem to denigrate the other... you're either a 'luvvy' or a 'boffin'."
He added that technology should be a compulsory subject to
GCSE level and that the UK suffers the risk of
"throwing away" its computing heritage, giving the example of the
BBC Micro for when it was at its peak.
Google+ is primarily an identity serviceWhether it was a slip-up or not,
Schmidt said in response to a question that
Google+ was primarily an identity service and that it was important that people use their real names on it in case they build any future products using it as their key identity platform.
Google has
come under criticism from many identity and privacy advocates over the insistence on the use of real names on Google+, which the company officially positions as a social network.
Schmidt emphasised that anyone worried about privacy can elect not to use the service or delete their account, but many have pointed out that doing the latter does hamper the use of other Google applications and tools.